Here there be monsters (socratic) wrote,
Here there be monsters

Paul Krugman thinks you're a tool

Paul Krugman's latest NYTimes column (I won't link to it because nobody has TimesSelect) suggests that the Democrats shouldn't do anything about the deficit because it'll just enable some future Bush to squander the money. While there is a decent argument to be made that Clinton's fiscal responsibility paved the way for the worst president in U.S. history to spend even MORE, but suggesting that doing the right thing is wrong because someone's just gonna come along and fuck it up later is both cynical and condescending.

It also suggests that the American people can't be trusted.

Now yes, pulling the lever for Bush was a catastrophic thing to do. Anyone who did that was either rich and short-sighted or ignorant and stupid. But if you assume that we can't be trusted with our own governance, well, the whole system falls apart. Once you start down that road you find yourself headed to a very dangerous place. The Democrats have to assume that in the future the American people will make good choices, or at least that there's a chance they will.

Fiscal responsibility is essential at this point in time. We're headed into a very volatile period of history, and owing more to China and Japan will just make things worse. We need to get our house in order. Krugman's arguing that we shouldn't do so because the inbred hill people of Arkansas are going to vote another semi-sentient chimp into the White House has a logical fallacy in it. If the inbred hill people elect another chimp it won't matter what we do. We're fucked.

Democrats need to govern as wisely as possible and hope for the best.
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.